Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
Cc: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Date: 2005-06-28 20:43:17
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE094572@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > I *think* that's easy enough to do in time for 8.1. Trivial patch
> > attached. I hope it's enough :-) It passed my very quick testing...
> >
> > (Yup, I read the mails aobut PGCLIENTENCODING, but an option to
> > pg_dump is certainly easier)
>
> You forgot to document the long option, I think.

Oops. Fixed. Thanks.

//Magnus

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_dump.sgml.diff application/octet-stream 827 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2005-06-28 20:48:56 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-28 20:37:54 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2005-06-28 20:48:56 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-28 20:37:54 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles