Re: default database creation with initdb

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: default database creation with initdb
Date: 2005-06-18 08:49:14
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE094541@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Umm. Tiny item, but your comment still refers to the database as
pg_system ;-)

//Magnus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Andreas Pflug
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:42 AM
> To: PostgreSQL-patches
> Subject: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
>
> As per discussion on -hackers the attached patch creates the
> 'default'
> database at initdb time as a default target for initial
> connections to keep template1 free from connections and
> available as template source.
>
> I consider this DB a system object, so it's created before
> make_template0 sets the last_system_oid (wondering why
> template0 isn't considered a system db too)
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-18 08:53:55 Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-06-18 08:30:37 Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-18 08:55:21 Re: default database creation with initdb
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-18 08:42:02 default database creation with initdb