Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_autovacuum in PG9.x

From: Brett Mc Bride <brett(dot)mcbride(at)deakin(dot)edu(dot)au>
To: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum in PG9.x
Date: 2012-04-04 01:40:57
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-performance

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of David Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, 4 April 2012 11:37 AM
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [PERFORM] pg_autovacuum in PG9.x


What is/is there a replacement for pg_autovacuum in PG9.0+ ? 

I haven't had much luck looking for it in the docs. 



Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Hi Dave,
It's part of core now:

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: David KerrDate: 2012-04-04 01:51:30
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum in PG9.x
Previous:From: David KerrDate: 2012-04-04 01:36:33
Subject: pg_autovacuum in PG9.x

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group