Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date: 2012-02-28 19:33:08
Message-ID: 6B358188-E3E3-4584-AF10-D8628E2DBB1A@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 28, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

> I liked the shorter name, myself, but I'm not going to make a big deal about it.

pg_ is used quite a bit. what about pg_fdw?

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-02-28 19:42:22 Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-02-28 19:30:58 Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement