Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)

From: robert engels <rengels(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)
Date: 2008-05-01 20:27:26
Message-ID: 6A1ABD75-2DA6-4CD1-91FD-4EB39F66A566@ix.netcom.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
This seems like a very bad impl - at least for JDBC.

Why are the details of this access not hidden in the JDBC driver? The  
column type is the only thing that a user should be concerned with.

Why would someone want to code proprietary Postgres code just to  
access BLOBs?

The JDBC blob API is very good. Using either the BLOB/locator  
interface or the getInputStream();

Oracle used to do a similar thing, and finally got with the program  
and uses strict JDBC in their latest driver releases.


Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2008-05-01 23:44:34
Subject: Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2008-05-01 02:43:00
Subject: Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group