Yes, but the load of 200 concurrent fork()ed backends might be worse. :)
From: Joseph Shraibman [mailto:jks(at)selectacast(dot)net]
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do
"Clark, Joel" wrote:
> I haven't found PG to have much connection overhead, why would
> a connection-per-query require server side connection pooling?
Each connection causes the backend to fork. With a heavy load you'll
feel the overhead of creating and closing so many connections.
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Alexaki Sofia||Date: 2000-12-19 14:51:45|
|Subject: Shared Memory: out of memory|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2000-12-19 13:21:03|
|Subject: RE: version numbers of WinODBC|