Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Date: 2002-09-29 02:16:54
Message-ID: 6972.1033265814@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Sean Chittenden wrote:
>> Was there any resolution to this or are SET's still starting a new
>> transaction? I haven't seen any commits re: this, iirc. -sc

> It is still an open item, but I think there was agreement that SET will
> not start a transaction, and we will document that.

There was? I thought you were resisting it tooth and nail ;-)

If you're willing to accept this behavior, I shall make it happen.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-29 02:23:02 Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-29 01:31:09 Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?