Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Date: 2002-09-29 02:16:54
Message-ID: 6972.1033265814@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Sean Chittenden wrote:
>> Was there any resolution to this or are SET's still starting a new
>> transaction?  I haven't seen any commits re: this, iirc.  -sc

> It is still an open item, but I think there was agreement that SET will
> not start a transaction, and we will document that.

There was?  I thought you were resisting it tooth and nail ;-)

If you're willing to accept this behavior, I shall make it happen.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-29 02:23:02
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-29 01:31:09
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group