| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |
| Date: | 2005-02-25 18:25:35 |
| Message-ID: | 6918.1109355935@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> "It fails on my machine" should not be read as "it doesn't
>> work for anyone".
>> It all depends on how your local mbstowcs() works.
> Ok,... Do you have an example of a system on which it works?
On HPUX 10.20, mbstowcs seems to treat all byte values as single-byte
characters in C locale, so my sample-of-one says that it works
everywhere ;-).
Nonetheless, it's clear that in C locale mbstowcs cannot be buying us
anything compared to using the old <ctype.h> macros, so I'm fine with
adding a check on the locale as per previous discussion.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-02-25 18:26:55 | Re: idea for concurrent seqscans |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-25 18:21:21 | Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Hansen | 2005-02-25 18:38:29 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |
| Previous Message | John Hansen | 2005-02-25 18:17:48 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |