Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Key word table update for SQL:2008
Date: 2008-11-26 13:33:17
Message-ID: 6892.1227706397@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I was planning to update the key words table 
> (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-keywords-appendix.html) 
> for SQL:2008 and was wondering whether there is interest in keeping the 
> SQL-92 through SQL:2003 columns.  It might look a bit overloaded then.

> Comments?

Perhaps the most useful thing would be to keep SQL-92 and latest, so
as to show the "full range" in what's been reserved or not in different
spec revisions.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2008-11-26 14:36:39
Subject: Re: New XML-based man page build
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-11-26 11:32:12
Subject: Re: New XML-based man page build

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group