On Jun 10, 2004, at 12:02 PM, Anjan Dave wrote:
> Was there anything specific that helped you decide on a RAID-5 and not
> a RAID-10?
performance testing on restore times. My DB is more than 50% write, so
I needed to optimize for writes.
> I have my DBs on RAID10, and would soon be moving them on FC drives,
> and i am considering RAID-10.
If I had to do it over again, I'd most likely go with RAID-50, and take
the hit on restore time for the advantage on reads. I have to dig
through my records again to see the details... but then I have to do
all that for my OSCON presentation on this topic at the end of July in
Portland, OR. ;-)
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Jean-Luc Lachance||Date: 2004-06-10 16:56:26|
|Subject: Re: *very* inefficient choice made by the planner (regarding|
|Previous:||From: Anjan Dave||Date: 2004-06-10 16:02:46|
|Subject: Re: Database Server Tuning|