Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DELETE performance problem

From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos(dot)it(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jerry Champlin <jchamplin(at)absolute-performance(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DELETE performance problem
Date: 2009-11-24 15:14:46
Message-ID: 68676e00911240714n5dd717fbxb2b0e3b8827cf539@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jerry Champlin
<jchamplin(at)absolute-performance(dot)com> wrote:
> You may want to consider using partitioning.  That way you can drop the
> appropriate partition and never have the overhead of a delete.

Hum, I don't think it's doable in my case; the partitioning is not
know a priori. First t1 is fully populated, then the data is loaded
and manipulated by my application, the result is stored in t2; only
then I want to remove (part of) the data from t1.

thanks,
Luca

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2009-11-24 15:19:23
Subject: Re: DELETE performance problem
Previous:From: Denis LussierDate: 2009-11-24 15:10:17
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Strange performance degradation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group