Hi,

Thanks a lot for the reply


>  Since the cluster will be multi-master/dual-primary, do I need to have a
>> separate block device for each PostgreSQL instance or can it use the DRBD
>> device?
>>
>
> I don't understand how you want to have a multimaster PostgreSQL setup with
> DRBD.  DRBD can only be used for an inactive standby.


So, DRBD dual primary and Cybercluster multimaster, cannot be combined?


>  I believe cybercluster is the most active and complete PostgreSQL
>> clustering solution.
>> My endgoal is a two node cluster with load sharing and fail over where
>> both nodes can perform reads and writes.
>>
>
> That's not going to happen very easily, if at all.


Why not?Cybercluster is a multimaster clustering solution for PostgreSQL
DRBD supports dual primary
>From the feature list:

> Dual primary support for use with GFS/OCFS2


Perhaps it can be done without DRBD then?

In many cases asynchronous replication is just not enough to model a certain
> business case.

Therefore Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH offers a synchronous multimaster
> replication solution for PostgreSQL called Cybercluster.


Thanks,

Serge Fonville

In response to

• Re: PostgreSQL clustering with DRBD at 2009-02-11 11:26:22 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

• Re: PostgreSQL clustering with DRBD at 2009-02-11 14:15:54 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Kusuma Pabba	Date: 2009-02-11 12:43:12
	Subject: small doubt
Previous:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2009-02-11 11:26:22
	Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering with DRBD