Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
>> Ideally the archiving
>> process would also discard records from aborted transactions, but I'm
>> not sure how hard that'd be to do.

> Unless we have UNDO we also need to roll forward the physical changes of 
> aborted transactions, or later redo records will "sit on a wrong physical image".

Wouldn't it be the same as the case where we *do* have UNDO?  How is a
removed tuple different from a tuple that was never there?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• AW: Re: Backup and Recovery at 2001-07-06 08:22:24 from Zeugswetter Andreas SB

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-07-06 13:29:02
	Subject: Re: Proper use of select() parameter nfds?
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2001-07-06 10:52:49
	Subject: Re: Re: Backup and Recovery