Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling
Date: 2000-03-09 01:04:48
Message-ID: 6768.952563888@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Any suggestions on how I might handle this?
>> 
>> Er ... run 7.0beta ?

> Based on recent threads on this list, I have the
> impression that 7.0beta is not quite ready for production.

A fair objection, since in fact it isn't.  Moving to 7 now will probably
cost you at least one extra dump/initdb/reload cycle, since we are
likely to force another initdb before final release.  However, if the
alternative is continuing to get bit by a 6.5 bug, it seems to me that
being an early adopter of 7.0 is not such a bad choice.

I wouldn't actually suggest picking up 7.0beta1 at this point, since
we've fixed a number of flaws since then; the latest nightly snapshot
would be better.  Or you might want to wait for 7.0beta2, which should
be out in a day or two.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2000-03-09 01:10:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regex (from TODO)
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-03-09 00:43:35
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group