Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, I am supposed to see if I can fix this and get rid of the "into"
> field in SelectStmt at the same time. Right Tom?
Yeah, we had talked about that ... but I'm not sure it's worth the
trouble. I don't see any clean way for the SELECT grammar rule to
return info about an INTO clause, other than by including it in
Probably the easiest answer is for CreateCommandTag to just deal with
drilling down into the parsetree to see if INTO appears.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2002-03-20 19:47:59|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: 7.2b2 today|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-03-20 19:35:43|
|Subject: Firebird 2.0 moving to C++|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-03-20 20:08:53|
|Subject: Re: Domain Support -- another round |
|Previous:||From: Fernando Nasser||Date: 2002-03-20 18:14:29|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fixes gram.y|