Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue
Date: 2011-08-01 19:53:19
Message-ID: 672.1312228399@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> OK, so I should split this into 2 patches?
> Even without the compression, it's probably worth the 16 -> 10 byte
> reduction that would result from removing the 2nd CTID in the UPDATE
> case, and that part would be a pretty small patch.

Yeah, my point exactly.  The rest of it might or might not be worth the
extra complication.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-08-01 20:02:39
Subject: Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
Previous:From: Dean RasheedDate: 2011-08-01 19:48:07
Subject: Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group