Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,"Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Date: 2005-01-08 17:37:49
Message-ID: 6697.1105205869@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
"T.J." <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net> writes:
> Has anyone else tested out the use of client certs with the new win 
> code? Rebuilt the latest from scratch and I started getting SSL SYSCALL, 
> so I went into fe-secure.c, and commented out line 842 (again), and now 
> it works (again). Any ideas why commenting that line is such a 
> penicillin? Or rather, why that if statement is causing such problems. 

Doh --- isn't fstat's st_ino a meaningless value on Windows?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-01-08 22:02:04
Subject: Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2005-01-08 13:36:47
Subject: Re: RC4 MSI is up...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group