| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
| Date: | 2005-01-08 17:37:49 |
| Message-ID: | 6697.1105205869@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"T.J." <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net> writes:
> Has anyone else tested out the use of client certs with the new win
> code? Rebuilt the latest from scratch and I started getting SSL SYSCALL,
> so I went into fe-secure.c, and commented out line 842 (again), and now
> it works (again). Any ideas why commenting that line is such a
> penicillin? Or rather, why that if statement is causing such problems.
Doh --- isn't fstat's st_ino a meaningless value on Windows?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-01-08 22:02:04 | Re: [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-01-08 13:36:47 | Re: RC4 MSI is up... |