Re: timestamp() functions still documented

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp() functions still documented
Date: 2002-05-03 14:02:36
Message-ID: 6679.1020434556@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> There are seven timestamp() functions in pg_proc and I don't think any
> of them can be used; should they not be removed or renamed?

Not unless you want to break the cast operations that use these
functions. OID 2025 isn't a cast and perhaps should be renamed,
but the rest are correct as-is.

I do agree that something needs to be done with the documentation...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-05-03 14:15:42 Re: timestamp() functions still documented
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2002-05-03 08:46:51 timestamp() functions still documented