Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Date: 2006-10-04 14:35:26
Message-ID: 6643.1159972526@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> The point was, that >= 2.2 won't be allowed when it comes out for
>> win32, even if it should work.

> Right. So I'd update it once we see a working version other than 1.875.

No, we should ship it that way to start with. Otherwise we're going to
get caught with no released source code that will allow 2.2.

A look at ftp.gnu.org says that 2.2 was released 19-May-2006 and
2.3 was released 05-Jun-2006. So it's not like these versions are
fresh off the boat. I think it's safe to assume that someone will
bother to compile them for Windows, probably sooner not later.
We should be making sure our code works with them, rather than
making sure it doesn't.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-04 14:38:01 Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-04 14:29:11 Re: [HACKERS] DOC: catalog.sgml

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-04 14:38:01 Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-04 14:29:11 Re: [HACKERS] DOC: catalog.sgml