Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date: 1998-10-29 18:27:47
Message-ID: 6604.909685667@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> I just committed inet regression test fixes and resolved the
> "@" operator problem.

Great!  I think that means it's safe to put out a BETA4, Marc.

Leastwise I promise to stop breaking things for a while ;-)

			regards, tom lane

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: geek+Date: 1998-10-29 18:51:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-10-29 18:25:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group