Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fwd: Has anyone built pgbash-7.3 against postgreSQL-8.3?

From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Darren Weber" <darren(dot)weber(dot)lists(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Has anyone built pgbash-7.3 against postgreSQL-8.3?
Date: 2008-10-02 01:22:56
Message-ID: 65937bea0810011822m1feeb576i1e9819da6bbe4a2@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
I think the -hackers subscribers list is a subset of -general subscribers;
so this wasn't necessary.

Any hackers out there who is not on general list?

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Darren Weber
<darren(dot)weber(dot)lists(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> I put the email below on the general list, without response.  I hope
> it gets some response from the hackers list.
>
> Thanks, Darren
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Darren Weber <darren(dot)weber(dot)lists(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Date: Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:10 PM
> Subject: Has anyone built pgbash-7.3 against postgreSQL-8.3?
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: sakaida(at)psn(dot)co(dot)jp
>
>
> I'm curious about pgbash.  I've taken a look at the website here:
> http://www.psn.co.jp/PostgreSQL/pgbash/index-e.html
>
> According to the history on the main home page, the pgbash package was
> last updated in 2003, ie:
> 2003.02.11 : pgbash-7.3 released (for PostgreSQL-7.3 and bash-2.05a).
>
> I've made a start to build that package against postgresql-8.3 (on
> macports).  The build failed with:
>
> cc -O2 -I/opt/local/include/postgresql83  -c exec_sql_main.c
> exec_sql_main.c:130: error: static declaration of 'sqlca' follows
> non-static declaration
> sqlca.h:44: error: previous declaration of 'sqlca' was here
> make[1]: *** [exec_sql_main.o] Error 1
> make: *** [../exec_sql/exec_sql_init.o] Error 1
>
> It would be nice to debug this, if anyone can help?
>
> I wonder about the general status of pgbash among the postgres
> community - is it useful and is it still used?  Perhaps something else
> replaced it and the development work stopped in 2003 in favor of
> something else?
>
> Thanks, Darren
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>



-- 
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com

EnterpriseDB      http://www.enterprisedb.com

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2008-10-02 01:23:53
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1076)
Previous:From: Hitoshi HaradaDate: 2008-10-02 01:16:47
Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-10-02 01:25:09
Subject: Re: Fwd: Has anyone built pgbash-7.3 against postgreSQL-8.3?
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-10-02 00:34:42
Subject: Re: Transactions within a function body

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group