Re: pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "George Gensure" <werkt0(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch
Date: 2008-04-30 04:34:30
Message-ID: 65937bea0804292134l1d590696x16d8d078f35f9887@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, George Gensure <werkt0(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the
> administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but
> didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the
> read side.
>
>
IMHO, the function should return NULL if the postmaster never reloaded; that
is, it was started, but never signaled to reload.

Best regards,
--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com

EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-04-30 09:01:57 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous Message George Gensure 2008-04-30 04:23:09 pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch