The comment, "This should be improved someday" sure sounds like a TODO to
me.

I don't know if it should make it to the TODO doc, as that lists
high-level/abstract feature-request-like items.

Probably I should stop acting on impulse here. Hey, can someone around here
lend me his rock!! ( no offence intended :)

Best wishes to all in the new year...

Best regards,

-- 
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

On 12/31/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > This just so that somebody looking for TODO items in the source can find
> > this one too.
>
> If you're looking for TODO items, why wouldn't you be looking in the
> TODO document?
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

In response to

• Re: Added the word TODO in comments at 2006-12-31 17:34:01 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Added the word TODO in comments at 2007-01-03 15:16:41 from Jim Nasby

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tatsuo Ishii	Date: 2007-01-01 14:26:14
	Subject: Request for review: tsearch2 patch
Previous:	From: Gurjeet Singh	Date: 2007-01-01 07:13:10
	Subject: Re: A possible TODO item