Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > >

From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: TODO item not wanted: > > * Embedded server (not wanted) > >
Date: 2006-12-16 15:35:39
Message-ID: 65937bea0612160735o307daddfh76a15b9b31915366@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
On 12/15/06, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> TODO item not wanted:
>
> >
> > * Embedded server (not wanted)
> >
> >   While PostgreSQL clients runs fine limited-resource environments, the


I think its a typo. Should it have been:

> While PostgreSQL clients runs fine *in* limited-resource environments, the

Or 'under' !

>   server requires multiple processes and a stable pool of resources to
> >   run reliabily and efficiently.  Stripping down the PostgreSQL server
> >   to run in the same process address space as the client application
> >   would add too much complexity and failure cases.
>
>

-- 
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: User OkbobDate: 2006-12-16 17:13:01
Subject: plpsm - plpgpsm: basic cursor support
Previous:From: User HinoueDate: 2006-12-16 12:02:54
Subject: psqlodbc - psqlodbc: The version is now 8.2.0203.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group