Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work

From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Matt Miller" <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work
Date: 2006-11-20 16:50:47
Message-ID: 65937bea0611200850q205ef2d8qe2a038e23cdd7340@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 11/18/06, Matt Miller <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm> wrote:
>
> So,
> I think the proper migration process for a production database would be
> to first change the Oracle DB to use CURRENT_DATE (or some other
> standard psuedo column), since that will work properly under both Oracle
> and Postgres.
>

Correct approach. BTW, have you given EnterpriseDB a try?

--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Harris 2006-11-20 16:53:12 Re: [GENERAL] Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3
Previous Message Tony Caduto 2006-11-20 16:41:37 Re: Is there a PostgreSQL utility that is similiar to Oracles

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Harris 2006-11-20 16:53:12 Re: [GENERAL] Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-20 16:46:15 Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity