Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start
Date: 2011-09-12 14:31:23
Message-ID: 6547.1315837883@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I started work on proposed check statement option and there are a few questions?

> what is sense of this statement for others PL?

IMO you should design this as a call to the PL's validator function.
It's not necessary to make other PLs do anything more than their
existing validators do (at least for now).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-09-12 14:37:35
Subject: Re: Patch to improve reliability of postgresql on linux nfs
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-12 14:30:21
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group