Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?
Date: 2000-12-20 19:13:29
Message-ID: 6528.977339609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> It seems that init_irels() should be called after
> InitializeTransactionSystem() was called.

Can we just swap the order of the RelationCacheInitialize() and
InitializeTransactionSystem() calls in InitPostgres? If that
works, I'd have no objection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-20 19:28:01 Re: Is PQreset() proper ?
Previous Message Marc SCHAEFER 2000-12-20 19:04:50 Re: Re: [ADMIN] Help me for "DBI->connect failed: Sorry, too many clients already."