Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server unreliability

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Date: 2004-09-30 01:16:26
Message-ID: 64f2b1140449efdaa79c34b2fe010e5a@biglumber.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
 
>> Basically, with no money and no one offering servers
 
> So far, I've had one person donate $10 ... in order to put a dedicated
> server onto the network, I'd need alot more of those
 
FWIW, I've been more than willing to put my money where my mouth is,
but as long as we have banner ads all over out site, I'm not willing
to provide money. I seem to recall that people offered to offset the
costs of the banner ads earlier, but the discusion never got anywhere,
mostly because nobody could produce the amount that the banner ads
brought in.
 
As far as suggestions, why not all chip in and get a nice dedicated server
in a centralized place (e.g. Washington DC), get it up and running,
and migrate things over one by one.
 
 
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200409292037
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
iD8DBQFBW16evJuQZxSWSsgRAoaVAJwJy/6UfZsqc4CBimYybiGyeCPA/QCdFqD3
zzKVQCcnPLyPN93f7GwiIFA=
=30J6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Richard WeltyDate: 2004-09-30 01:39:50
Subject: Re: Server unreliability
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-09-30 00:34:21
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2004-09-30 01:22:45
Subject: Re: Press Release, Final Draft?
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-09-30 00:34:21
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group