Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our
Date: 2005-11-15 04:48:07
Message-ID: 6494.1132030087@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackers
Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's something in what you say.  We'd have to rename pg_clog as well,
>> since that's even more critical than pg_xlog ...

> Rename them to pg_donttouchthis and pg_youneedthis.

:-)

On a more serious level: Tim's suggestion of "pg_wal" for pg_xlog sounds
fine to me.  How about "pg_trans" for pg_clog, by analogy to the
existing pg_subtrans?  Nothing else in the standard layout looks like
it's got a name that a newbie would think means discardable data.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2005-11-15 06:27:23
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL roadmap for 8.2 and beyond.
Previous:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2005-11-15 04:32:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: ITS ONT Alcazar, Jose Aguedo CDate: 2005-11-15 04:48:17
Subject: Re: Major Problem, need help! Can't run our website!
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-15 04:35:35
Subject: Re: Major Problem, need help! Can't run our website!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group