Yes, May i know any particular reason for behaving this. Are its looking for
any consistency. I havnt got any clear picture here.
Could you Please explain this..
Thanks & Regards
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Tadipathri Raghu <traghu(dot)dba(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > Hi All,
> > Thank you for all the support.
> > I have noticed one more thing here, that if you turn off the fsync and
> > to run the transaction than its breaking the currnet filenode and
> > another filenode. Is it true that whenever you turn off or on the fsync
> > filenode will break and create one more on that table.
> From what I understand, with fsync on or off the same stuff gets
> written. It's just not guaranteed to go out in the right order or
> right now, but eventually.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Matthew Wakeling||Date: 2010-03-29 11:17:50|
|Subject: Re: Optimizer showing wrong rows in plan|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2010-03-29 06:45:44|
|Subject: Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB|