Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas T(dot) Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>, Arrigo Triulzi <arrigo(at)albourne(dot)com>
Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]
Date: 2000-12-31 04:21:04
Message-ID: 6434.978236464@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-general
"Thomas T. Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com> writes:
>> Uh, why are you altering NS32K code in an Alpha patch?  I did not apply
>> this.

> cause egcs on NetBSD/Alpha will give lots of error during compile. we
> don't have gcc 2.95.2 on the alpha working yet.

But the proposed diff is inside #if defined(NEED_NS32K_TAS_ASM).
How can that affect an Alpha compilation at all?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-12-31 11:18:59
Subject: Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]
Previous:From: Thomas T. ThaiDate: 2000-12-31 04:17:29
Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: GHDate: 2000-12-31 05:23:12
Subject: Re: how to show foreign keys of a table
Previous:From: Thomas T. ThaiDate: 2000-12-31 04:17:29
Subject: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group