Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 04:00:43
Message-ID: 6423.1063339243@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>> Please, only the first two.  Make the Unixware template add __i386__.
>> Don't add assumptions about valid user-namespace symbols.

> that's reasonable.  At least until 64-bit UnixWare. :-)

Even then, I'd prefer to put the necessary kluge into template/unixware
or Makefile.unixware or port/unixware.h, rather than add a risky
assumption globally.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2003-09-12 04:02:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2003-09-12 03:52:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2003-09-12 04:02:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2003-09-12 03:52:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group