From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zeki Mokhtarzada <zeki(at)freewebz(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Primary key duplicates |
Date: | 2004-08-14 02:50:26 |
Message-ID: | 641.1092451826@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Zeki Mokhtarzada <zeki(at)freewebz(dot)com> writes:
> It appears that I can select the rows, but not delete or update them.
That's *very* odd, because it works for me. Is the same true of both
those duplicate rows, or did you only try the one with nonzero xmax?
I think there must be something we don't know about the states of those
rows. Could you grab pg_filedump from http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/
(note: right at the moment that server seems to be down, but I suppose
it'll be up soon) and dump out page 53101 of this table? Usually
I find "-i -f" to be the most informative formatting option.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-08-14 08:21:33 | Re: Turkish downcasting in PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Zeki Mokhtarzada | 2004-08-14 02:34:19 | Re: Primary key duplicates |