On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:56 PM, Thom Brown wrote:

>>> The first form of aggregate expression invokes the aggregate across all input rows for which the given expression(s) yield non-null values. (Actually, it is up to the aggregate function whether to ignore null values or not — but all the standard ones do.)
>> 
>> -- http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES
>> 
>> That, however, is not true of array_agg():
>> 
>> try=# CREATE TABLE foo(id int);
>> CREATE TABLE
>> try=# INSERT INTO foo values(1), (2), (NULL), (3);
>> INSERT 0 4
>> try=# select array_agg(id) from foo;
>>  array_agg
>> ──────────────
>>  {1,2,NULL,3}
>> (1 row)
>> 
>> So are the docs right, or is array_agg() right?
> 
> I think it might be both.  array_agg doesn't return NULL, it returns
> an array which contains NULL.

No, string_agg() doesn't work this way, for example:

select string_agg(id::text, ',') from foo;
 string_agg 
────────────
 1,2,3
(1 row)

Note that it's not:

select string_agg(id::text, ',') from foo;
 string_agg 
────────────
 1,2,,3
(1 row)

Best,

David

In response to

• Re: array_agg() NULL Handling at 2010-09-01 06:56:58 from Thom Brown

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Heikki Linnakangas	Date: 2010-09-01 07:11:39
	Subject: Re: Interruptible sleeps (was Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!)
Previous:	From: Thom Brown	Date: 2010-09-01 06:56:58
	Subject: Re: array_agg() NULL Handling