Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> don't we normally announce if initdb is required on new beta releases? We
It was sloppy that we didn't do that for beta5, and I apologize for it.
One problem is that we don't have a defined place for per-beta-version
release notes. The current structure of release.sgml doesn't cater for
it --- and I doubt we want to permanently memorialize beta-version
issues anyway. Any thoughts?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bill Harris||Date: 2004-11-30 05:49:56|
|Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] USENET vs Mailing Lists Poll ...|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-11-30 04:35:03|
|Subject: Re: 8.0beta5 results w/ dbt2 |