| From: | "Marcus Andree S(dot) Magalhaes" <marcus(dot)magalhaes(at)vlinfo(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | <henr-and(at)dsv(dot)su(dot)se> |
| Cc: | <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: getGeneratedKeys() |
| Date: | 2003-12-30 23:28:21 |
| Message-ID: | 63735.200.174.148.100.1072826901.squirrel@webmail.webnow.com.br |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Guys,
I am too dumb or a simple currval() would be useful?
We solved this by sending two queries in JDBC. The first one inserts
a single record in the db. The other issues a currval on the desired
sequence.
There was a posting a few weeks ago, describing a clever method,
issuing both queries on the same connection by using the ";" operator
to separate the queries.
hope this helps.
>> Can you do the insert using a function instead, and return the currval
>> on the underlying sequence?
>>
>> John
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. A stored procedure?
>
> The good thing about getGeneratedKeys() is that you don't have to write
> DB-specific code.
> --
> Henrik
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Thomas | 2003-12-30 23:56:23 | Re: getGeneratedKeys() |
| Previous Message | henr-and | 2003-12-30 23:18:47 | Re: getGeneratedKeys() |