Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL List Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Date: 2007-07-20 18:32:34
Message-ID: 624757D4-970F-4898-AD63-A7BD450B73C3@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-performance
On Jul 20, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
>> Has anyone benchmarked HEAD against 8.2? I'd like some numbers to  
>> use in my OSCon lightning talk. Numbers for both with and without  
>> HOT would be even better (I know we've got HOT-specific  
>> benchmarks, but I want complete 8.2 -> 8.3 numbers).
>
> We've done it on TPCE, which is a hard benchmark for PostgreSQL.   
> On that it's +9% without HOT and +13% with HOT.  I think SpecJ  
> would show a greater difference, but we're still focussed on  
> benchmarks we can publish (i.e. 8.2.4) right now.

Bleh, that's not a very impressive number.

Anyone else have something better?
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)



In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Jignesh K. ShahDate: 2007-07-20 18:56:31
Subject: Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-07-20 18:23:51
Subject: Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2007-07-20 18:35:28
Subject: Re: Feature Matrix
Previous:From: Jim NasbyDate: 2007-07-20 18:30:58
Subject: Re: What's new in 8.3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group