Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: dynamic-static date

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomasz Myrta <jasiek(at)lamer(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dynamic-static date
Date: 2001-09-12 17:38:07
Message-ID: 6195.1000316287@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Tomasz Myrta <jasiek(at)lamer(dot)pl> writes:
> Why the first expression is 25 times slower?

Hard to say, when you haven't shown us the schema.  (Column datatypes,
definitions of available indexes, etc are all critical information for
this sort of question.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-09-12 17:51:10
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: [tao-users] FW: HEADS UP: CVSup timestamp bug]]
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-09-12 17:28:39
Subject: Re: factorial doc bug?

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: pgsql-bugsDate: 2001-09-13 08:54:16
Subject: Bug #450: triggered data change violation on relation
Previous:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2001-09-12 17:10:11
Subject: Re: Bug #449: there is a problem with foreign key

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group