Re: dynamic-static date

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomasz Myrta <jasiek(at)lamer(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dynamic-static date
Date: 2001-09-12 17:38:07
Message-ID: 6195.1000316287@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Tomasz Myrta <jasiek(at)lamer(dot)pl> writes:
> Why the first expression is 25 times slower?

Hard to say, when you haven't shown us the schema. (Column datatypes,
definitions of available indexes, etc are all critical information for
this sort of question.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql-bugs 2001-09-13 08:54:16 Bug #450: triggered data change violation on relation
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-09-12 17:10:11 Re: Bug #449: there is a problem with foreign key

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-09-12 17:51:10 [Fwd: [Fwd: [tao-users] FW: HEADS UP: CVSup timestamp bug]]
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-09-12 17:28:39 Re: factorial doc bug?