Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: prashanth(at)jibenetworks(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?
Date: 2003-04-29 19:49:46
Message-ID: 6185.1051645786@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

prashanth(at)jibenetworks(dot)com writes:
> I found some messages in 03/2002 that also brought up the performance
> issue. You had suggested the use of shared-memory, and made reference
> to a "SI model". I did find see any alternative non-table-based
> suggestions. What is the "SI model"?

I meant following the example of the existing shared-cache-invalidation
signaling mechanism --- see
src/backend/storage/ipc/sinvaladt.c
src/backend/storage/ipc/sinval.c
src/include/storage/sinvaladt.h
src/include/storage/sinval.h

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message prashanth 2003-04-29 19:54:00 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?
Previous Message prashanth 2003-04-29 19:46:24 Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY benchmarks?