Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000

From: "Marcus Andree S(dot) Magalhaes" <marcus(dot)magalhaes(at)vlinfo(dot)com(dot)br>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <marcus(dot)magalhaes(at)vlinfo(dot)com(dot)br>, <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>,<nfesposi(at)sourceweave(dot)net>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000
Date: 2004-03-29 10:57:43
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-performance
> Marcus,
>> We are experiencing exactly the same problem here, and we use 7.4 on
>> Linux/i386 SMP (2 processors). Our databases does even more access:
>> about 30k selects per hour, 10k updates and inserts per hour
>> Vacuum analyze is done daily.
> What is your max_fsm_pages setting?     If you are getting 10,000
> updates per  hour, daily VACUUM ANALYZE may not be enough.

max_fsm_pages is set to 500000

> Also do you run VACUUM ANALYZE as a superuser, or as a regular user?

As a regular user (database owner). Is thery any difference when vacuuming
as a super user?

> --
> Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
> your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Fabio EspositoDate: 2004-03-29 13:09:22
Subject: Re: postgres eating CPU on HP9000
Previous:From: Andrew RawnsleyDate: 2004-03-28 19:49:54
Subject: Re: column size too large, is this a bug?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group