Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Caleb Welton <cwelton(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin
Date: 2009-12-02 03:38:17
Message-ID: 617.1259725097@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Caleb Welton <cwelton(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
> I believe the int2vectorin function should handle invalid input more cleanly.

Why bother?  Under what circumstances would users (or anyone at all)
be putting data into an int2vector?  It's an internal type and is
certainly not meant for use in user tables.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2009-12-02 03:45:08
Subject: Re: Page-level version upgrade (was: Block-level CRC checks)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-12-02 03:34:11
Subject: Re: Page-level version upgrade (was: Block-level CRC checks)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group