Re: TB-sized databases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matthew <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TB-sized databases
Date: 2007-12-07 01:55:02
Message-ID: 6126.1196992502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I wrote:
> Hmm. IIRC, there are smarts in there about whether a mergejoin can
> terminate early because of disparate ranges of the two join variables.
> Seems like it should be straightforward to fix it to also consider
> whether the time-to-return-first-row will be bloated because of
> disparate ranges.

I've posted a proposed patch for this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-12/msg00025.php

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2007-12-07 03:55:17 Re: TB-sized databases
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2007-12-07 01:28:24 Re: TB-sized databases