| From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql cluster on SAN |
| Date: | 2005-09-27 04:20:18 |
| Message-ID: | 60u0g7jg59.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
robertngo(at)perridot(dot)com (Robert Ngo) writes:
> How about i have one SAN storage for the slony master node and
> another SAN to be share by slave nodes that only do SELECT?
That seems like a reasonable sort of idea...
> Can Dell|EMC AX100i iscsi san with sata drive serve as storage for
> postgresql server, will there be problem in I/O performance?
I would imagine that the SAN would provide better I/O performance than
having a couple of IDE drives; whether you'll have a "problem in I/O
performance" depends heavily on what kind of load the system will
experience.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/rdbms.html
"Linux is only free if your time has no value." -- Jamie Zawinski
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-09-27 14:57:03 | Re: Preventing database access (including valid users in |
| Previous Message | Robert Ngo | 2005-09-27 03:43:47 | Re: postgresql cluster on SAN |