Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB
Date: 2008-03-26 15:11:56
Message-ID: 60skyd7c5f.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

kadams(at)mxlogic(dot)com (Keaton Adams) writes:
> That is an interesting question. If our organization were to help fund the
> development of such a feature, would that be something taken into
> consideration by the development team?

I seem to recall there being a relevant Google Summer of Code project
about this, last year.

http://code.google.com/soc/2007/postgres/appinfo.html?csaid=6545828A8197EBC6

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg00050.php

I do not recall how far it got. It obviously didn't make it into 8.3
;-)!
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/rdbms.html
Why are they called apartments, when they're all stuck together?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2008-03-26 15:20:13 Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)
Previous Message Raymond O'Donnell 2008-03-26 15:07:12 Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-03-26 15:21:51 Re: Script binaries renaming
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-03-26 15:05:50 Re: advancing snapshot's xmin