tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) writes:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:30:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> If we're going to remove from the tutorial every feature for which
>>> any aspect is deemed by someone to be broken, the tutorial is liable
>>> to become quite short.
>> Are there other pieces that are broken?
> Between the locale behavior and the trailing-spaces behavior, one could
> make the case that the entire set of textual datatypes are broken.
> Other examples will occur to your thought if you follow pgsql-bugs.
> My point here is that one man's unusably broken feature may be another
> man's quite useful feature. Postgres is a work in progress, and
> probably always will be. I don't object to pointing out shortcomings,
> but removing all mention of a feature because it has some shortcomings
> seems not the best way.
Ah, but suggesting that people devote time to adding documentation for
less controversial features, so that we actually _do_ see some more
documentation, seems a good thing :-).
output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc")
Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it sounds?
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-07-25 04:25:43|
|Subject: 7.5 release notes|
|Previous:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2004-07-23 21:15:05|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2004-07-23 22:49:54|
|Subject: Re: Fixing PKs and Uniques in tablespaces|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2004-07-23 22:02:53|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Wrong index choosen?|