Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is there a TODO here? The only problem I see is that it introduces the
> idea of special column-1 handling, which we don't have right now, except
> in COPY.
I think the idea would be to execute what's effectively a COPY IN during
the CREATE FUNCTION command, and then use the data so collected as the
function body. It seems doable offhand, though we'd have to think about
whether this breaks any aspect of the FE/BE protocol, or whether it's
truly a user-friendly interface.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2003-08-30 16:06:25|
|Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE ... TO ... to change related names|
|Previous:||From: Dan Langille||Date: 2003-08-30 16:00:46|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?|