Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: limit?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: limit?
Date: 2000-06-21 21:44:57
Message-ID: 6088.961623897@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Is limit ignored in a cursor definition?

Yes.  Seems to me we discussed that and decided it was a feature,
not a bug.  Check the archives if you want to know why; I don't
recall.

If we do believe that, though, probably DECLARE CURSOR ... LIMIT
ought to give an error, instead of silently ignoring the limit
as it does now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • limit? at 2000-06-21 18:03:52 from Michael Meskes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-06-21 22:07:11
Subject: Re: Changes to functions and triggers
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-06-21 21:39:38
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group