Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
Cc: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list
Date: 2003-08-21 19:30:27
Message-ID: 607akv8ibs68uohlvkbp0g2pfn39lmj3hp@4ax.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:05:52 +0200, I wrote:
>>Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs?
>
>Firebird.

Stop!  I withdraw that statement.  I must have mis-read some feature
list :-(

Tests with InterBase 6 showed that you can change metadata within a
transaction, but when you ROLLBACK, metadata changes persist.

Servus
 Manfred

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephan SzaboDate: 2003-08-21 20:04:07
Subject: Re: postgresql 7.3.2 bug on date '1901-12-13' and '1901-12
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-08-21 19:22:21
Subject: Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Ian BarwickDate: 2003-08-21 20:19:57
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL" bullet list
Previous:From: AutoresponderDate: 2003-08-21 19:12:47
Subject: Re: Thank you!

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Philip BoonzaaierDate: 2003-08-21 19:37:02
Subject: Re: Bulk Insert / Update / Delete
Previous:From: Philip BoonzaaierDate: 2003-08-21 18:33:32
Subject: Re: Bulk Insert / Update / Delete

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group