Re: experiments in query optimization

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Faheem Mitha <faheem(at)email(dot)unc(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: experiments in query optimization
Date: 2010-03-29 18:02:03
Message-ID: 603c8f071003291102g778afc2fvda0fc281454526c9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Faheem Mitha <faheem(at)email(dot)unc(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been trying to reduce both memory usage and runtime for a query.
> Comments/suggestions gratefully received. Details are at
>
> http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.pdf
>
> See particularly Section 1 - Background and Discussion.
>
> If you want a text version, see
>
> http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.tex
>
> For background see
>
> http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/diag.pdf (text version
> http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/diag.tex) and
> http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/snppy.pdf
>
> Please CC any replies to me at the above email address. Thanks.

Didn't you (or someone) post about these queries before?

It's not really too clear to me from reading this what specific
questions you're trying to answer. One random thought: WHERE
row_number() = 1 is not too efficient. Try using LIMIT or DISTINCT ON
instead.

If you're concerned about memory usage, try reducing work_mem; you've
probably got it set to something huge.

You might need to create some indices, too.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Faheem Mitha 2010-03-29 18:31:44 Re: experiments in query optimization
Previous Message Andy Colson 2010-03-29 17:36:04 Re: Performance regarding LIKE searches