Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date: 2010-03-05 20:56:28
Message-ID: 603c8f071003051256o6b9f9eban6d61afa6449aa6d@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have
> less users installing the documentation.

I don't see why.  And even if it's true, it just means some people
were installing the docs "by accident" before even though they didn't
really want them.

...Robert

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-05 20:57:53
Subject: Re: BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-03-05 20:53:41
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group